<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Which is simpler: BPMN or BPEL?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vosibilities.com/bpel/bpmn-or-bpel-which-is-simpler/2009/11/19/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vosibilities.com/bpel/bpmn-or-bpel-which-is-simpler/2009/11/19/</link>
	<description>ActiveVOS: the BPMS that development teams love</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 19:02:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: BPMN vs BPEL: The Debate Goes On (Sigh) &#171; BPMS Watch</title>
		<link>http://www.vosibilities.com/bpel/bpmn-or-bpel-which-is-simpler/2009/11/19/comment-page-1/#comment-616</link>
		<dc:creator>BPMN vs BPEL: The Debate Goes On (Sigh) &#171; BPMS Watch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 01:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vosibilities.com/?p=1187#comment-616</guid>
		<description>[...] should have known that disputing Michael Rowley&#8217;s contention that mapping BPMN to BPEL was &#8220;simpler&#8221; than a straight BPMN 2.0 solution would invite a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] should have known that disputing Michael Rowley&#8217;s contention that mapping BPMN to BPEL was &#8220;simpler&#8221; than a straight BPMN 2.0 solution would invite a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BPMN 2.0 and BPEL: a debate with Bruce Silver that's just getting started &#124; VOSibilities</title>
		<link>http://www.vosibilities.com/bpel/bpmn-or-bpel-which-is-simpler/2009/11/19/comment-page-1/#comment-614</link>
		<dc:creator>BPMN 2.0 and BPEL: a debate with Bruce Silver that's just getting started &#124; VOSibilities</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 20:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vosibilities.com/?p=1187#comment-614</guid>
		<description>[...] Silver saw my previous post on the simplicity of BPMN vs. BPEL for execution and wondered: &#8220;Are we still debating [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Silver saw my previous post on the simplicity of BPMN vs. BPEL for execution and wondered: &#8220;Are we still debating [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BPMN with BPEL, an ongoing debate &#124; SOA Governance - Service Oriented Architecture - SOA Business - SOA Design - SOA Services - SOA Software - SOA Solutions - SOA Security - SOA Web Service</title>
		<link>http://www.vosibilities.com/bpel/bpmn-or-bpel-which-is-simpler/2009/11/19/comment-page-1/#comment-611</link>
		<dc:creator>BPMN with BPEL, an ongoing debate &#124; SOA Governance - Service Oriented Architecture - SOA Business - SOA Design - SOA Services - SOA Software - SOA Solutions - SOA Security - SOA Web Service</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 06:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vosibilities.com/?p=1187#comment-611</guid>
		<description>[...] does not make modeling with Business Process Modeling Notation (BPMN) simpler. He had seen a recent blog post by Active Endpoints CTO Michael Rowley claiming that BPMN2.0 with BPEL is simpler than the new BPMN [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] does not make modeling with Business Process Modeling Notation (BPMN) simpler. He had seen a recent blog post by Active Endpoints CTO Michael Rowley claiming that BPMN2.0 with BPEL is simpler than the new BPMN [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BPMN 2.0: modeling process applications &#124; VOSibilities</title>
		<link>http://www.vosibilities.com/bpel/bpmn-or-bpel-which-is-simpler/2009/11/19/comment-page-1/#comment-606</link>
		<dc:creator>BPMN 2.0: modeling process applications &#124; VOSibilities</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vosibilities.com/?p=1187#comment-606</guid>
		<description>[...] VOSibilities  ActiveVOS: the BPMS that development teams love      &#171; Which is simpler: BPMN or BPEL? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] VOSibilities  ActiveVOS: the BPMS that development teams love      &laquo; Which is simpler: BPMN or BPEL? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BPMN vs BPEL: Are We Still Debating This? &#171; BPMS Watch</title>
		<link>http://www.vosibilities.com/bpel/bpmn-or-bpel-which-is-simpler/2009/11/19/comment-page-1/#comment-605</link>
		<dc:creator>BPMN vs BPEL: Are We Still Debating This? &#171; BPMS Watch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 23:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vosibilities.com/?p=1187#comment-605</guid>
		<description>[...] Endpoints&#8217; Alex Neihaus points me to a post by his CTO Michael Rowley entitled &#8220;Which is simpler: BPMN or BPEL?&#8221;  I&#8217;m groaning before I even read it, because I know where Michael is headed.  Right [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Endpoints&#8217; Alex Neihaus points me to a post by his CTO Michael Rowley entitled &#8220;Which is simpler: BPMN or BPEL?&#8221;  I&#8217;m groaning before I even read it, because I know where Michael is headed.  Right [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
