<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bitch slappin&#8217; BPMS: a BPMN and BPEL war of words</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vosibilities.com/bpel/bitch-slappin-bpms-a-bpel-bpmn-war-of-words/2008/07/10/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vosibilities.com/bpel/bitch-slappin-bpms-a-bpel-bpmn-war-of-words/2008/07/10/</link>
	<description>ActiveVOS: the BPMS that development teams love</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 20:27:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Silver</title>
		<link>http://www.vosibilities.com/bpel/bitch-slappin-bpms-a-bpel-bpmn-war-of-words/2008/07/10/comment-page-1/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Silver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 18:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vosibilities.com/?p=105#comment-56</guid>
		<description>Slapped down good, I guess, since so far Nick has shut up, not put up.  I don&#039;t think I&#039;m a purist, but I am a member of the so-called BPM community, and while that community does not speak with a single voice, I think I&#039;m correct in saying Nick&#039;s characterization of BPM is an outsider &quot;making it up.&quot;  One quibble I have with your piece is that point-click implementation design without code - even if you do it all in BPMN proper (impossible) - is not the same as implementation by business users.  It sounds like your company, along with many others in the BPMS world, is offering the former.  I think the nub of the issue is that the target user of your design tool or Lombarardi&#039;s is considered by guys like Nick to be a &quot;business user.&quot;  Real business users would laugh at this (or like me, consider it just out of touch).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Slapped down good, I guess, since so far Nick has shut up, not put up.  I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;m a purist, but I am a member of the so-called BPM community, and while that community does not speak with a single voice, I think I&#8217;m correct in saying Nick&#8217;s characterization of BPM is an outsider &#8220;making it up.&#8221;  One quibble I have with your piece is that point-click implementation design without code &#8211; even if you do it all in BPMN proper (impossible) &#8211; is not the same as implementation by business users.  It sounds like your company, along with many others in the BPMS world, is offering the former.  I think the nub of the issue is that the target user of your design tool or Lombarardi&#8217;s is considered by guys like Nick to be a &#8220;business user.&#8221;  Real business users would laugh at this (or like me, consider it just out of touch).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
